Okay, so you’re sold on green; where do you begin? Start with the “Three Rs” - Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Just remember, the Three Rs are in order for a reason: businesses should start by Reducing, follow with Reusing, and finish with Recycling. This way, you can ease employees into going green; a lot of companies rush to implement a recycling program, only to watch it backfire.
How Your Small Business Can Go Green Using the Three Rs
Who among you guys wants our environment to become safe and clean by using eco-friendly products?
and you can get extra income too………..
and can earn extra income too!!!! I CAN PROVE IT TO YOU!!!!
what do you mean by eco friendly? email me at itsyoboysteve@gmail.com
What do you think of definition of philosophy by M.N.ROY and his philosophy radical humanism? read details?
“Philosophy”, according to Roy, “Begins when man’s spiritual needs are no longer satisfied by primitive natural religion which imagines and worships a variety of gods as personification of the diverse phenomena of nature. The grown-up man discredits the nursery-tales, with which he was impressed in his spiritual childhood … Intellectual growth impels and emboldens him to seek in nature itself the causes of all natural phenomena; to find in nature a unity behind its diversity.”[
In his book Science and Philosophy Roy defines philosophy as “the theory of life”. The function of philosophy, in words of Roy, “is to solve the riddle of the Universe”.
Elaborating on his definition of philosophy, Roy says:
Philosophy is the theory of life, because it was born of the efforts of man to explain nature and to understand his own being in relation to its surroundings; to solve the actual problems of life in the light of past experience, so that the solution will give him an encouraging glimpse into the future.
Roy thought that in the absence of political freedom, economic equality is of no use and searched for truth and studied physical science, chemistry,psychology and philosophy extensively and abolished his own political party, Radical democratic party and his thoughts are known as radical humanism.
Roy’s thoughts are nearer to Gandhi and his school of thought. Both accepted the individual as the central point of all social thought and action.Both stood for decentralization of political and economic power, and both suggested party less democracy for purifying politics.
The fundamental differences between Roy and Gandhi are, Roy a materialist and rationalist while Gandhi was a spiritualist and relied more on his inner voice.
Roy says " so long as the purpose of politics is to capture power, we can not do without parties. But if we do not want to capture power, we can practice politics without parties. in the absence of a party, the practice of delegation of power disappears and also the constitutional sanction for the concentration of power. We can have a harmonious society, which will be a free society without destroying the freedom of the individual, where the freedom welfare and prosperity of society will be the sum total of the freedom, welfare and prosperity actually enjoyed by the individual men and women constituting that society"
His famous quotations are "Man is moral because he is rational." ‘Man is maker of his own world."
ROY thought of communism’s utter disregard of and contempt for man,
He found man had been reduced to the position of a helpless pawn in the hands of blind economic forces and an insignificant unit in the broad collectivity of a class. He was denied independence as well as sovereignty. He felt neither capitalism nor communism showed the way out the crisis.
Freedom is the basic value in radical humanism. It is the supreme value from which all human values are derived.
The function of life is to live. The basic incentive of organic becoming is the struggle for survival. It goes on throughout the long process of biological evolution, until in man ,it becomes the conscious urge from freedom, the supreme human value. Everything that man has done, every one of his acts, cultural progress motivated by that one urge.Man is finite, while the universe is infinite and his environment, in the analysis is the whole universe. consequently his struggle for freedom is eternal he can never conquer the universe. Therefore the urge for freedom is the only eternal thing in the human world. this urge enables man to acquire knowledge, he conquers his environment by knowing. radical humanism as a philosophy of life covers the entire field of human existence from abstract thought to social and political reconstruction. It does not believe in transcendentalism. according to it, man is the creature of nature, he is an integral part of the physical universe.The universe is a law governed system. There fore the urge for freedom lies in the animal struggle for survival. Everything that man has done, every one of his acts, cultural progress, scientific achievements, artistic creation, everything has been motivated by that one urge This urge enables man to acquire knowledge; he conquers his environment by knowing" There fore, man’s being and becoming his emotions will ideas are also predetermined. Therefore man is essentially ration.The reason in man is an echo of the harmony of the universe. morality grows as rationality develops. it is not necessary, therefore to o to any external or transcendental authority to trace the growth of man from a primitive human being to a civilized citizen.
According to Roy, the social struggle for human progress, the entire process of human evolution is nothing but the continuation of the struggle for existence on a higher level, where that struggle is no longer guided by instinct and natural selection but by intelligence, choice and reasoning.
Roy’s views on revolutio
I agree with Roy in relation to his observation that the human being evolves from a primitive, magical for of religion, which creates dependency. With this evolution comes an understanding of man as developing knowledge integrating social and psychological phenomena. I would say not all persons, because religious fanatics like Bush, Palin and Bin Laden for example, remain mired in this quasi religious primitivism forever.Roy thought that Communism was destructive of human freedom. That would only be the case with Stalinism, which was a perversion of Communism, however this would not apply to Socialism as practiced in some of the Scandinavian countriesJiyoti Basu, Hugo Chavez, Evo Morales and Fidel Castro., Lenin and Leon Trotsky, In any case Roy is a great philosopher and his thoughts must be taken very seriously
What is the best way to market eco-friendly products to high school and college kids?
I just want some feedback from the general public on the best ways to market eco-friendly products to high school and college kids. What methods do you think is best to get the message across?
Many high school and college students are already into the green/eco friendly concept (or at least they like to think they are) so that’s obviously a very important aspect of the product. If it looks cheesy (uncool in the world of the high school student) no one will by it. All aspects of advertising the product should really focus on balancing eco friendly with the latest trends. If advertising through the radio or television, for example, you’ll probably want the more popular recent music rather than old classics. For whatever reason, listing to the same music as our parents did and attaching that to a product can (sometimes) turn us off. Anyways, lots of music, color (maybe even green?) and a cool look will have us all hocked in for sure.
Good luck : )
Are there any sustainability interships in the west this summer?
My boyfriend and I are wanting to live off the grid. We’re wanting to go to an intership for grey water usage, rain water catchment, solar panels, and organic gardening. We’re looking for something in the west. Can anyone help? Thanks.
It sounds like you should look for an organic farm to live on. There are a lot of organic farms that will house you and work you all day long. And then maybe to contribute you can learn about rain water catchment, solar panels, etc from the internet to help them out. I would start calling small organic farms and asking them when their busy seasons are if they are looking for help and explain your situation. Good luck!
Is the world suffering from Cognitive Dissonance (CD)?
Did you see the movie Avatar? If you have not then go and see it, you would be doing yourself a favor.
When I went to see the film, all the audience in the theatre CHEERED and CLAPPED when the sympathetic humans decided to go and aid the inhabitants. The Audience went into a joyous frenzy when the inhabitants finally WON and managed to kill half the marines and the miners and destroyed the machines, space ships, buildings and equipment of the corporation.
Here is my question to you….if you saw the movie….did you cheer too? ….do you think that it is right that the audience should cheer?
WHY….do you think that it is right that the audience should cheer???
Maybe your thoughts are along the lines of:
===========
The corporation is an Imperialist, aggressor and does not have the right to take the poor inhabitants’ resources while driving them away from their homes.
The marines are wrong in defending the aggressor corporation and helping them achieve their Imperialistic goals with the power of the gun.
The humans who helped the inhabitants were doing the morally right thing in helping the poor defenseless inhabitants and are to be commended for doing so.
===========
So you would not consider that the humans who aided the inhabitants are Treasonous, Communistic, Liberals who are stopping Capitalism and progress and the free market. Also you don’t consider those deserters as Antipatriotic Murderers for helping the inhabitants in killing half the marines and miners and destroying most of their equipment.
Also, you do not consider the inhabitants as TERRORISTS for attacking the corporation and the marines trying to stop them from carrying on with their business. Furthermore, it definitely did not cross your mind that the marines were correct in attacking the monkey people since they started the attack, and that the preemptive strikes the marines executed against the inhabitants to stop them from any future possible attacks were justifiable in order to defend the concerns of the corporation which after all is only practicing sound Capitalistic principles and is only going to bring benefits, good life standards, jobs, and pursuit of happiness to the humans.
Even the backwards monkey people would also benefit. Won’t they also eventually learn the ways of the humans and become space travelers and miners themselves and will eventually participate in the freedoms that the corporation is making possible. At the very least they may be allowed to open casinos…no?
Even if you do not agree with the atrocious things the corporation is doing to the blue monkeys, you need to support our human brothers, the marines, who are only doing their duty in defending their Planet and the human way of life…so we need to support them while they are there even if we do not agree that they should be there. To have some cowardly deserters do what the Avatar guys did is the ultimate in treason and is the most heinous unpatriotic thing possible and is the most horrendous crime…no?
===========
If you cheered for the TERRORIST blue monkeys and you clapped for the TREASONOUS DESERTER humans then you are SUFFERING Cognitive Dissonance…….
===========
Cognitive Dissonance is the mental conflict that occurs when beliefs or assumptions are contradicted by new information. The unease or tension that the conflict arouses in a person is alleviated by one of several defensive maneuvers:
1- Rejection of the new information.
2- Explaining away the new information.
3- Avoiding the new information.
4- Persuading oneself that no conflict really exists.
5- Reconciling the differences.
Or one resorts to any other defensive means of preserving stability and order in his conception of the world and of himself.
You may ask why do I say so…..well…..the fact that you are asking after reading all the above stuff is proof enough that you are suffering CD…. and of course….by definition…. you are not going to be able to understand the explanation which is between the lines in the above paragraphs in the first place.
One possible cure for CD is to have some doses of REAL knowledge of HISTORY and CONTEMPORARY events and politics…..However, the side effects of this medicine are heartache, restless conscious syndrome, high blood pressure, insomnia, liberalism, atheism, inability to see the glass as half full, incessant intelligent thinking…..but all these side effects also have a very palatable sure to cure medicine called TV.
We are in the 21st century and have gone to the moon and furthest expanses of Earth and STILL most humans on this planet are TRIBAL…… Tribalism leads to Cognitive Dissonance and inability to see RIGHT from WRONG….. right is what my tribe does and wrong is what the other tribes do.
Ignorance Is Definitely a BLISS
After all you said, you still didn’t answer the question of which tribe has the right to their own culture. How is that determined? Do they all then just start a whole new culture? All you did was raise questions and call people ignorant. The fact is that everyone has to be validated to be mentally stable. So what is right and wrong? I did not see the movie but often times people have attacked other cultures because their resources were running out or their governments were oppressive so they move on to another place. Should the people who move on have just stayed put and died? What is right and what is wrong? Won’t the more advanced culture always win out in such situations?
Obama and New Green Business. ?
If there are new green business’s that are created and supported financially by the government, do you think these new business’s should be regulated ?
I just read in a cattle magazine that there is talk of taxing each head with a green house emission tax, also crops which put of carbon dioxide. Yes regulation on top of this stupidity is just what we need.
what are some ways to develop a plan to improve the sustainability and livability of a city?
Look at the community in which you live and develop a plan to improve the sustainability and livability of the city (if you are in a major city look in your area/neighborhood of the city). Can greenbelts be added: Are there bike trails, bike lanes, or wide sidewalks? Can areas be made into parks? Can trees be planted to sequester carbon and shade streets, sidewalks and buildings? Define what is meant by the terms sustainability and livability and how they relate to cities.
Well, you look at the recent plans of Victoria, Australia’s Sustainability Plans. They decided to invent rooftop gardens in the city. It is great because the tall building are filled with plants. However, the city is still filled with non-rooftop garden buildings.
Why Oppose the Reality of Global Warming?
Though deniers of global warming aren’t deserving of a thorough explanation of how global warming is indeed a human-instigated phenomenon (research it, don’t gripe about it here), how is it at all excusable to oppose the effort to hedge climate change?
Hypothetically, let’s just say global warming isn’t caused by humans. Let’s just say it’s a natural change in the planet’s average temperature. Or, better yet, let’s just say the earth is the same temperature for the past 100 million years (5,000 years for creationists). If this is so, why do so many people detest the idea of being more conscious of the impact we have on our ecosystem (however light some may imagine). Who does recycling hurt? How is conserving energy (even without the threat of an energy crisis) somehow foolish?
The only argument against climate change policy that has any merit is the ridiculous claim: "It’s bad for business! And what’s bad for business is bad for America!"
Newsflash! If the government gives incentives to business to streamline their methods of doing business by reducing emissions, materials and various other forms of waste, you have the engine of capitalism propelling markets to be more responsible. As a matter of fact, the Japanese and many of our European friends have gotten a jump start on the United States because they have addressed this form of "New Capitalism" long ago.
So far ahead are many of these foreign companies, we actually rely on them to supply us with the best in renewable energy technology (e.g. photovoltaic cells, wind turbines, etc.).
But no, apparently "free-market" lunatics hate the idea of a potentially damaging and oligarchical system like capitalism from being nudged into a positive direction because that would be indicative of a GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER! Good lord! Heaven forbid we use a tool like government (it is a tool, conservatives; the Greeks didn’t develop a republic just have a big, bad boogeyman looming over them) to curb the tyrannical tendencies of those who have amassed tremendous wealth and power!
So, who cares if it’s all a sham? What do millions of scientist have to gain through empirical testing on climate change? What do progressives win if we all start acting responsible? Certainly there is no personal profit form any of this except the satisfaction of knowing that we will prolong our species’ life on this planet, that we have preserved the health and beauty of our surroundings and that we need not worry about where we get our energy fix.
To oppose efforts that make these improvements is a non-sequitur. It’s almost like opposing the idea of cleaning dirty dishes just because they don’t pose a deadly threat. Conservatives, I point my finger stiffly at you: do you really take charge of an issue ONLY when we’re facing the prospect of annihilation?
Those who are behind the efforts to convince the world that global warming is a myth are those who have most to loose, Exxon Mobil being one of the biggest but includes many of those who make millions out of the selling our existing natural resources.
This is no different than when a few decades ago incontrovertible evidence showing the link between smoking and numerous fatal diseases was put forward by those scientists studying the subject. The Tobacco companies funded sceptics, started health reassurance campaigns, ran advertisements in medical journals and researched alternate explanations for lung cancer, such as pollution, asbestos and even the keeping of birds. Denying the case against tobacco was "closed," they called for more research as a tactic to delay regulation.
Those behind the septics movement have only one agenda to make every last cent they can for the diminishing resources they control. The more they discourage people from changing to alternative methods of energy, with all their propaganda, the more their dwindling resources will be worth as the worlds increasing needs for energy will guarantee. What these interests mean when they say ecological measures are "bad for business" is really "it is bad for OUR business"
These people have no more interest in the health of our world and the need to manage and control our resources any more than the tobacco companies cared about the people who would die prematurely . The really unfortunate thing is those in control of the world’s energy resources have so much more money to spend on their campaign of disinformation and are able to mount a much larger effort to fudge the issue and consequently convincing more people of their lies.
Though as you point out even if global warming was a myth the world’s natural resources of oil and gas are running out. Only by massive research and changing to alternative sources of power now will we able to avoid a future of massive energy shortages and even more wars over the diminishing supplies, which in Iraq and the Kuwait war we have already seen.
With tobacco companies they could only cause the destruction of individuals the energy corporations if they win this battle and stop us taking the necessary actions could cause the destruction of the whole planet or at best a world in chaos, where countries are unable to produce enough energy for the basics of life for their population.
The only light I see in the darkness of the future world we are leaving our children and grandchildren is that more of the world are seeing through the lies and realising the importance of our environment and natural resources. As someone who has been banging on about this for decades, when I was considered a total loony, today there are far more people finally seeing the dangers we face. Whether this is "too little too late" and those with the power can make the many difficult decisions and compromises needed to make the changes necessary to avoid catastrophe, only time will tell.